A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to develop their relatives property. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially designed, is in the proper place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which includes considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth in the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned Just about the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place Paul Feely accountant influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant from the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to build a household house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Earlier been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the end result stays uncertain. The court need to decide whether the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside together with one another extended after the authorized fees have already been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it'll in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.