A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to build their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established inhabitants. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably in a sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partially created, is in the proper place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-large water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that come to be emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up covered in detail through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Rene Collier and Paul Feely Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their action is determined by issue for environmental safety and adherence to preparing legislation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public watch, insisting rather that it is about guaranteeing that development at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their lengthy-standing relationship to the realm and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply just looking to develop a family members house in accordance Using the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Space of Conservation and say that each one operates are already completed based on Qualified information and accepted plans. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include coming into The ocean throughout a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions on how setting up disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of construction of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for the scenario that many observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation in between personal land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become additional contentious.
The Irish Instances report about René Collier mentioned the businessman experienced Beforehand been associated with community advocacy on preparing and environmental problems, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from incredibly distinctive professional backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Moments coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting each the physical actuality in the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court need to establish if the wall as created complies with setting up authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing situations. But the human component stays central: neighbours who need to Reside together with one another extended after the lawful charges are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental security and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin lately.